首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring the Initial Steps of the Testing Process: Frequency and Nature of Pre-Preanalytic Errors.
【2h】

Exploring the Initial Steps of the Testing Process: Frequency and Nature of Pre-Preanalytic Errors.

机译:探索测试过程的初始步骤:分析前错误的频率和性质。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the nature of errors in the so-called pre-preanalytic phase, the initial steps of the testing process. We therefore sought to evaluate pre-preanalytic errors using a study design that enabled us to observe the initial procedures performed in the ward, from the physician's test request to the delivery of specimens in the clinical laboratory. \ud\udMETHODS: After a 1-week direct observational phase designed to identify the operating procedures followed in 3 clinical wards, we recorded all nonconformities and errors occurring over a 6-month period. Overall, the study considered 8547 test requests, for which 15 917 blood sample tubes were collected and 52 982 tests undertaken. \ud\udRESULTS: No significant differences in error rates were found between the observational phase and the overall study period, but underfilling of coagulation tubes was found to occur more frequently in the direct observational phase (P = 0.043). In the overall study period, the frequency of errors was found to be particularly high regarding order transmission [29 916 parts per million (ppm)] and hemolysed samples (2537 ppm). The frequency of patient misidentification was 352 ppm, and the most frequent nonconformities were test requests recorded in the diary without the patient's name and failure to check the patient's identity at the time of blood draw. \ud\udCONCLUSIONS: The data collected in our study confirm the relative frequency of pre-preanalytic errors and underline the need to consensually prepare and adopt effective standard operating procedures in the initial steps of laboratory testing and to monitor compliance with these procedures over time. (C) 2011 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
机译:背景:在所谓的预分析前阶段(测试过程的初始步骤)中,关于错误性质的数据很少。因此,我们寻求使用研究设计来评估分析前的错误,该研究设计使我们能够观察病房中执行的初始程序,从医生的测试要求到临床实验室中的标本交付。方法:经过为期1周的直接观察阶段,旨在识别3个临床病房中遵循的操作程序,我们记录了6个月内发生的所有不合格和错误。总体而言,该研究考虑了8547个测试请求,为此收集了15 917个血液样本管并进行了52 982个测试。结果:在观察阶段和整个研究阶段之间,发现错误率没有显着差异,但在直接观察阶段,发现凝结管充盈不足的可能性更高(P = 0.043)。在整个研究期间,发现关于阶次传递[29 916百万分之一(ppm)]和溶血样品(2537 ppm)的错误发生频率特别高。患者错误识别的频率为352 ppm,最常见的不符合项是记录在日记中的测试请求,没有患者的姓名,也没有在抽血时检查患者的身份。结论:我们研究中收集的数据证实了分析前错误的相对发生频率,并强调了在实验室测试的初始步骤中有意识地准备和采用有效的标准操作程序以及随着时间的推移监测这些程序的遵从性的必要性。 (C)2011美国临床化学协会

著录项

  • 作者

    Carraro P; Zago T; Plebani M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:11:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号